Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Rejected Online!
Monday, February 23, 2009
Depends on Your Point of View
Friday, February 20, 2009
Congratulations Hawaii Reporter!
Way to go!
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Money Talks
Facebook Reverts to Previous Terms of Service
February 17, 2009 - 11:58 pm PDT - by Adam Ostrow 23 Comments
That was quick. A day after trying to defend changes to its Terms of Use, Facebook has pulled a 180 and decided to revert to its previous terms.
Earlier today, the company began polling its users about the controversial changes, with only 6 percent supporting them and 56 percent opposing (the other 38 percent simply responded “don’t know”). We posted the same poll on Mashable and the results were far more decisive – 88 percent voting to revert, 7 percent to keep, and 5 percent indifferent (as of 11pm PT).
Once again, CEO Mark Zuckerberg is the one breaking the news. In a blog post, he writes, “Going forward, we’ve decided to take a new approach towards developing our terms. We concluded that returning to our previous terms was the right thing for now. As I said yesterday, we think that a lot of the language in our terms is overly formal and protective so we don’t plan to leave it there for long.”
In a smart response to what I’ve previously characterized as a breakdown in communication more than anything else, the company has also established a Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities group, where members are encouraged to “give input and suggestions on Facebook’s Terms of Use.”
Smart move, Facebook. Unlike the breakdown over Beacon, which lasted for weeks, Facebook has diffused this crisis in a matter of days. Of course, it could’ve been prevented in the first place by clearly explaining the changes before posting them, but it appears Facebook has taken steps to ensure that this issue doesn’t plague the social network in the future.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
SHould Be Called WeLiedToYouBook
Facebook now owns old content
February 16th 2009
Author
by Edward Barrera
Feed
XML Feed
ADOTAS — Facebook has changed its terms of service, and apparently now, if you close your account, it can do anything it wants with your old content.
The terms of service used to say that when you closed an account on its network, any rights it claimed to the original content would expire. But things might have changed.
“we reserve the right to change any aspect or feature of the Facebook Service at any time without notice. The following sections will survive any termination of your use of the Facebook Service: Prohibited Conduct, User Content, Your Privacy Practices, Gift Credits, Ownership; Proprietary Rights, Licenses, Submissions, User Disputes; Complaints, Indemnity, General Disclaimers, Limitation on Liability, Termination and Changes to the Facebook Service, Arbitration, Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction and Other.”
Facebook can even sublicense content:
“You hereby grant Facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to (a) use, copy, publish, stream, store, retain, publicly perform or display, transmit, scan, reformat, modify, edit, frame, translate, excerpt, adapt, create derivative works and distribute (through multiple tiers), any User Content you (i) Post on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof subject only to your privacy settings or (ii) enable a user to Post, including by offering a Share Link on your website and (b) to use your name, likeness and image for any purpose, including commercial or advertising, each of (a) and (b) on or in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof.”
Apparently the line that covered you if you did close your account is missing.
“You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. If you choose to remove your User Content, the license granted above will automatically expire, however you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content.”
I’m not sure exactly how much this matters to me, but I’m sure others have a better understanding of this. I’m also unclear about say, photographers who post their stuff. Would that be Facebook property?
Friday, February 13, 2009
Arab hand dryers found in Chicago restroom
Monday, February 9, 2009
From One Digital Immigrant to Another
I learned how to type on a big, black manual typewriter in typing class one summer with the keys covered with tiny squares of masking tape to hide the letters and numbers. This is how I learned to touch type. I also learned to make carbon copies, to use Wite-Out when necessary. Then I learned to use an electric typewriter, followed by an IBM Selectric — super fast — with self-correcting tape. Then came computers. I learned first on an Apple II E and then switched gears and learned WordStar on an IBM computer. WordStar was a crazy word processing program that covered all the bases. Once you got it, you loved it. But then WordPerfect came out and I learned that, because while not as effective as WordStar, it was easier and knocked WordStar off the shelves. Soon, the programs were already installed in the computer when you bought it — no longer did we have to program our own computers or have to decide what program to use. I learned to use a fax machine, with the perforated paper — the same paper we had to feed into our old printers. Next, I bought a fax that used regular paper: a godsend. Ditto for my printer. And then I learned about email and the fax seemed old fashioned. I learned about modems, how to attach documents, to download photographs and pdf files. Concurrent to all this I learned how to buy a stereo, to test drive the huge speakers at stereo stores so that my 33s sounded amazing. Then I learned to operate a Walkman and all sorts of cassette-driven machines. But wait, say goodbye to cassettes. I then learned about CDs and CD players. But what about downloading music onto iPods? And first there were Beta tapes, soon replaced by VCR tapes and VCRs we had to hook up to our televisions. I learned about DVD players, DVRs and TiVo. And watching televison on my laptop. I also remember using rotary dial phones, then pushbuttons, and then cordless. Who needs more? Oh yes, answering machines you had to hook up yourself but allowed you to screen calls, replaced by voicemail operated by the phone company and caller ID so you could screen calls. I went through car phones, cell phones with huge antenae, and then tiny cell phones that flipped open. And Skype.
I think I can create a Facebook page...
Want to Get In On The Social Network Game?
Fatmata explained to me how she used the loan she got from you. As you might already know from her business description and early photo, Fatmata sells a number of items which include: cottons, “laise” clothes, “wax” clothes, jewelries and more. But however, with this loan she received from you, she decided to invest all of it (Le 400,000) on jean trousers and the balance on transportations and other costs associated with the business. She chose to use the whole loan on jeans because jeans sell faster and make more profit for her than all other items she sells. It is in neighboring Guinea that she buys the jeans from. A pair of jean trousers costs her Le 25,000 (about $ 8.4) and she sells at Le 30,000 (about $ 10).
Sunday, February 8, 2009
Just Another Ordinary Day in Hawaii
There will be blue skies, there will be "B" roll shots of the Atlantic Ocean. But here is what will be missing: some of the best players won't be there, because they can't risk an injury before the Super Bowl. The blue skies of Hawaii. The Pacific Ocean. Beautiful faces of many different colors. Leis and Hula.
Hallmark IS definitely About Relationships
- everybody's watching. Remember what your mother said about having your words on the front page of the New York Times.
- It's brave new world.
- We are all connected.
- The internet is magic.
- Hallmark is true to it's brand.
Here is part of the very thoughtful reply I received from Deidre Mize. My advice to readers: stick with Hallmark. They understand you.
Hi Gloria,
My name is Deidre Mize, I work at Hallmark in Public Affairs and
Communications.
I noticed your recent blog posting about one of Hallmark's Valentine's Day
commercials and wanted to respond.
When creating this commercial we wanted to show that love can be expressed
in a number of creative, economical and heartfelt ways, including Mom's
voice in a valentine.
As is our normal practice, our marketing team tested this commercial before
it aired among consumers, including mothers. These consumers responded
favorably, so we appreciate receiving different points of view like the one
you shared on your blog...
We are continually learning about the intricacies of these connections, and your perspective will help us to look at this differently in the future...
Thank you Deidre, and thank you, Hallmark.